Yuya wrote:

Fluff Fluff wrote:

March would basically make it so we have massive beaters that can attack directly, can't be targetted or destroyed by card effects, AND can't be targeted by attacks. Like ffs. I don't wanna overkill the signers lol

Do any of use tribute summon ?

I know for sure I don't....

i use it. so fu.

Not cool brah

Who's side are you on ?

we're all on the same side -_- you're all just being dumb and removing march. don't fucking do it

yes remove it plz

Rafael wrote:

we're all on the same side -_- you're all just being dumb and removing march. don't fucking do it

Cmon, we take from them. They should take from us. If you don't like it too bad .

you tell em the but srsly ban motm

Yuya wrote:

Rafael wrote:

we're all on the same side -_- you're all just being dumb and removing march. don't fucking do it

Cmon, we take from them. They should take from us. If you don't like it too bad .

we're not banning march.

He he fluff's holding the tournament and he decides. but i still think we should ban it or maybe limit it or semi limit

i'm up for that decision fluff. ban ss on EB side

EDIT: we still have to tribute summon them -_- i would rather go tribute summon then special summon. cuz if you ban march, tribute summon will be useless. and if you ban ss, yuya's unicorn thing will be useless

if you ban ss leave motm

Kill the amount of sense banning SS on the immortals side is none. Seriously though banning march is fair cuz the only way the signers are getting around them is through removel XD

Rafael wrote:

i'm up for that decision fluff. ban ss on EB side

EDIT: we still have to tribute summon them -_- i would rather go tribute summon then special summon. cuz if you ban march, tribute summon will be useless. and if you ban ss, yuya's unicorn thing will be useless

Mmk, what if they Remove March?

Then, our Earthbounds would be so easy to kill it's not even funny . And getting them back.... HA! I dare you to try but I doubt it would be so easy.

Yuya wrote:

Rafael wrote:

i'm up for that decision fluff. ban ss on EB side

EDIT: we still have to tribute summon them -_- i would rather go tribute summon then special summon. cuz if you ban march, tribute summon will be useless. and if you ban ss, yuya's unicorn thing will be useless

Mmk, what if they Remove March?

Then, our Earthbounds would be so easy to kill it's not even funny . And getting them back.... HA! I dare you to try but I doubt it would be so easy.

i deeply fucking disagree with anything you have to say e.e you have that unicorn to just ss from the deck every shit you want. others either have 2 options: to discard or send shit to grave to revive or tribute summon.

Honestly its debatable whether or not to remove it.

On one hand, the dark signer side, it gives us initiative to tribute summon, makes use of our very small ability fusion/synchro, and helps us against the inevitable backrow hate that most people are gonna try against our Earthbound.

On the other hand, the signer side, having an Earthbound on the field w/ March literally makes it unstoppable. We're not even talking Beelze broken. We're talking flat out should never have left the card designer's head and made it to corporate broken. A monster that can attack directly, can't be targeted for an attack, can't be targeted by card effects, and can't be destroyed by card effects. If you manage that I'd seriously pay to see your opponent overcome that. If they don't get MST or they don't side backrow destruction they literally lost. Think about that with my Earthbound. I could literally tribute summon it, put it into defense, and burn 1200 every turn for game. I mean, come on.

I'd more or less motion to ban the thing only because that's taking it beyond a broke level but I'll leave it up to more debate for right now. In part because I'm too tired to make any important decisions without a clouded consciousness.

attack or grave is op enough. it's not as hard as normal summon that's for sure. anyway, i still disagree banning march. normal summon's hard enough as it is

C.C. wrote:

Banning March of the Monarch is banning practically the only protection Dark Signers have. It's needed to do something good, to give them a fighting chance. You can just Dust Tornado it and MST it, just like you always do with other stuff. It's nothing new. Besides, it will require us to actually Tribute Summon the EB, which is always still something people are easily ready for. Malfunction, Warning, Horn of Heaven. Stuff like this still stops it. If you ban March, might as well ban those Traps.

Rafael wrote:

attack or grave is op enough. it's not as hard as normal summon that's for sure. anyway, i still disagree banning march. normal summon's hard enough as it is

Honestly, I think we should leave this up to the Signers. If they can handle it, then we have no issues do we?

deadlockx agreed that fluff decides. so yeah

I'm just letting March go. Tribute summoning is enough of a pain in the ass for us.

So march is the only thing that protects earthbounds? Dosent lance work? What about trap stun? Maybe even decree. I dont see how traps will slaughter earthbounds if you run half decent protection in your decks. Unless i have missed something in the rules or the earthbound effects that is.

I like Lance tbh but I'm just sticking up for those tribute summoning noobs (Kill) >.>

K so uhh I kiiiiiiiiiiiinda found a card that may be like March but worse. Mound Of The Bound Creator is officially banned. It was one thing with March because it was tribute summoned monsters and it wasn't exactly searchable. This you can literally bring to your hand first turn (via tournament rules) and it applies for ALL level 10 or higher monsters tribute summoned or not. Kinda seems a little bit strong to me :l