| | Fluff fluff Re-Test Results |   |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Project Lead Scientist
Founder
Posts : 1164
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2011-09-04
Character Sheet
Name:
HP:
    (100/100)
Age:
|  Subject: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:32 pm | |
| Giga Vise - Battlin' Boxer
Match Results: 15/15
He won game 1, and I DC'd midway game 2.
Ruling Knowledge: 12/20
3 correct, 2 wrong.
Attitude: 2/2
Really nice person. Had to wait for his whole test for 2 days, managed to eventually. Respect.
Duel Control: 5/10
The duels were mostly on and off for both of us. It was a real fight for the win, and never easy.
Use of Cards: 18/20
He used all his cards quite good.
Deck Consistency: 18/20
Looks quite consistent. Gets what he needs real well. Few deaddraws from what I've seen.
Concentration: 3/3
He was at the duel, even though I had extreme lag.
Side Deck: 13/15
Not sure what use a single Veiler is to you. Or the single Lance in Side.
Deck Originality: 2/5
Battlin' Boxer. Not exactly what you can call original, unfortunately. But, it works well.
Total points: 88/110
Slifer Red = 0-70
Ra Yellow = 71 - 95
Obelisk Blue = 96 - 110 |
|
| | |
Fluff Fluff
Zed
Posts : 4045
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2013-10-07
Age : 30
Location : Mist Valley
Character Sheet
Name: Fluff
HP:
(0/0)
Age: 20
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:41 pm | |
| Something tells me i'm not using boxers for testing anymore ;-; |
|
| | |
Fluff Fluff
Zed
Posts : 4045
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2013-10-07
Age : 30
Location : Mist Valley
Character Sheet
Name: Fluff
HP:
(0/0)
Age: 20
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:47 am | |
| Literally my entire supply of decks degraded after this loss. I tested multiple other ones I had in hopes that they could do better than my boxer deck and out of like 10 duels I haven't won a single one now. I think I just quit. |
|
| | |
Amaterasu
Moderator
Posts : 4394
Reputation : 13
Join date : 2013-08-31
Location : Hokage Mansion
Character Sheet
Name:
HP:
(100/100)
Age:
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:31 pm | |
| Don't quit. Make them better. But for the test, use something original (makes a difference) but still keep the deck. |
|
| | |
Fluff Fluff
Zed
Posts : 4045
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2013-10-07
Age : 30
Location : Mist Valley
Character Sheet
Name: Fluff
HP:
(0/0)
Age: 20
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:29 pm | |
| My only other option is a little more inconsistent. Boxers are honestly the best I've got ;-; |
|
| | |
-Kira-
Leona
Posts : 442
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2013-06-04
Age : 46
Location : In Kyo's Closet
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:13 pm | |
| Those rulings... i think ur problem is rulings ( like me ) if u improve on that u should be able to reach obelisk |
|
| | |
Fluff Fluff
Zed
Posts : 4045
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2013-10-07
Age : 30
Location : Mist Valley
Character Sheet
Name: Fluff
HP:
(0/0)
Age: 20
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sun Oct 27, 2013 5:22 am | |
| I know :/ I always end up panicing and second guessing myself |
|
| | |
Gallows
Zed
Posts : 929
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-26
Character Sheet
Name:
HP:
(100/100)
Age:
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:21 am | |
| The deck wasn't really a problem here. You won the Match and both, your Consistency and Side Deck score were nearly full. Originality was a bit down, but honestly, it is difficult to find a deck that would get full originality and performs really good.
If you would have answered all questions correctly, you'd be Obelisk. |
|
| | |
Fluff Fluff
Zed
Posts : 4045
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2013-10-07
Age : 30
Location : Mist Valley
Character Sheet
Name: Fluff
HP:
(0/0)
Age: 20
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:43 pm | |
| I was almost considering using my new Mist Valley deck for the next test. I mean honestly, how many people do you see using Mist Valley that isn't one of those ninja supported decks? I figured originality would score good in that section but I don't think it's as good or consistent as my boxer deck. If I have to lose 3 points on originality for a deck that performs great, then i'll risk it. I just need to get my rulings straight ;-; |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Fluff fluff Re-Test Results | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Fluff fluff Re-Test Results | |
|
